Yes. Sensationalist hype. However, I wouldn't complain much about AI if it was dedicated to these types of narrow uses and stayed off the internet essentially.
Exactly. Stop trying to create god, and give me a better way to clean up noise. (Some of the adobe neural filters were great, but I don't know what's happened with Photoshop in the last 2 years.)
To be fair the orginal post said Gemma "helped" the discovery, Google did not claim (yet?) the full ownership of the process.
But yes, I totally subscribe to the idea, many are shortcutting it to "AI is magic enough to do everything by itself" and it is always good to remind , as you did, humans are still required to achieve tho great outcomes, helped by some AI models
Yes, Google's language was more measured, but everyone ran away with interpretations that implied the machines have done something that signals a revolutionary new step toward real intelligence.
If only we could keep it in its narrow lane, instead of allowing it to be proclaimed master of the entire highway, and letting it run amok amongst us.
Agreed. There are some narrow beneficial uses, but even those probably don't deliver enough benefit for the cost to build and host these AI systems.
Very likely true, but truth is of minor importance when big money is to be made in trying to convince folks otherwise.
The headline should read, "Number cruncher crunches numbers."
These people are dogshit.
Yes. Sensationalist hype. However, I wouldn't complain much about AI if it was dedicated to these types of narrow uses and stayed off the internet essentially.
Exactly. Stop trying to create god, and give me a better way to clean up noise. (Some of the adobe neural filters were great, but I don't know what's happened with Photoshop in the last 2 years.)
To be fair the orginal post said Gemma "helped" the discovery, Google did not claim (yet?) the full ownership of the process.
But yes, I totally subscribe to the idea, many are shortcutting it to "AI is magic enough to do everything by itself" and it is always good to remind , as you did, humans are still required to achieve tho great outcomes, helped by some AI models
Yes, Google's language was more measured, but everyone ran away with interpretations that implied the machines have done something that signals a revolutionary new step toward real intelligence.